<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Laffer Curve Logic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/01/27/the-new-laffer-curve-logic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/01/27/the-new-laffer-curve-logic/</link>
	<description>Lane Kenworthy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transici&#243;n de Obama: pol&#237;tica econ&#243;mica (IV). M&#225;s sobre los impuestos. &#171; Sarah Palin en Español</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/01/27/the-new-laffer-curve-logic/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>Transici&#243;n de Obama: pol&#237;tica econ&#243;mica (IV). M&#225;s sobre los impuestos. &#171; Sarah Palin en Español</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.wordpress.com/?p=117#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>[...] críticos de Laffer dicen que no hay evidencias ni pruebas de que esto sea así. Por ejemplo, esto sostiene Lane Kenworthy en su blog, quien además critica a Laffer porque recientemente dice que además de evitar la actividad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] críticos de Laffer dicen que no hay evidencias ni pruebas de que esto sea así. Por ejemplo, esto sostiene Lane Kenworthy en su blog, quien además critica a Laffer porque recientemente dice que además de evitar la actividad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned Baker</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/01/27/the-new-laffer-curve-logic/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.wordpress.com/?p=117#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Nice analysis of Laffer&#039;s article.  I read it myself and had to write up a critique on my blog also.  This guy is a quack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analysis of Laffer&#8217;s article.  I read it myself and had to write up a critique on my blog also.  This guy is a quack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crooked Timber &#187; &#187; Other places</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/01/27/the-new-laffer-curve-logic/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Crooked Timber &#187; &#187; Other places</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.wordpress.com/?p=117#comment-81</guid>
		<description>[...] Lane Kenworthy on &#8220;the (il)logic of the new Laffer Curve&#8220;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lane Kenworthy on &#8220;the (il)logic of the new Laffer Curve&#8220;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
