<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Laffer Curve Logic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/01/27/the-new-laffer-curve-logic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/01/27/the-new-laffer-curve-logic/</link>
	<description>Lane Kenworthy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:54:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lane Kenworthy on the Laffer Curve &#124; Joseph N. Cohen</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/01/27/the-new-laffer-curve-logic/#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lane Kenworthy on the Laffer Curve &#124; Joseph N. Cohen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.wordpress.com/?p=117#comment-1837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Lane Kenworthy discusses the reemergence of Arthur Laffer, an economist whose shtick is basically that cutting taxes on the rich is beneficial to society.  He was quite popular in the early days of neoliberalism, but fell out of vogue among mainstream economics.  Apparently, Arthur Laffer is back, with a new line of reasoning that ultimately concludes that taxes on the rich should be reduced.  This time, the argument is basically that governments will lose much-needed tax revenue if they over-tax the rich, because the rich will simple evade or avoid taxes: &#8230;when the top marginal rate is increased, high-income taxpayers reduce their taxable reported income via “tax shelters, deferrals, gifts, write-offs, cross income mobility, or any of a number of other measures.” When the top marginal rate is reduced, they increase their taxable reported income. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lane Kenworthy discusses the reemergence of Arthur Laffer, an economist whose shtick is basically that cutting taxes on the rich is beneficial to society.  He was quite popular in the early days of neoliberalism, but fell out of vogue among mainstream economics.  Apparently, Arthur Laffer is back, with a new line of reasoning that ultimately concludes that taxes on the rich should be reduced.  This time, the argument is basically that governments will lose much-needed tax revenue if they over-tax the rich, because the rich will simple evade or avoid taxes: &#8230;when the top marginal rate is increased, high-income taxpayers reduce their taxable reported income via “tax shelters, deferrals, gifts, write-offs, cross income mobility, or any of a number of other measures.” When the top marginal rate is reduced, they increase their taxable reported income. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How will the proposed top-end tax rate increases affect government revenues? &#171; Consider the Evidence</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/01/27/the-new-laffer-curve-logic/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How will the proposed top-end tax rate increases affect government revenues? &#171; Consider the Evidence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.wordpress.com/?p=117#comment-1834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] How will the proposed top-end tax rate increases affect government&#160;revenues? August 11, 2010   Read Dylan Matthews, Paul Krugman, and perhaps also this. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How will the proposed top-end tax rate increases affect government&nbsp;revenues? August 11, 2010   Read Dylan Matthews, Paul Krugman, and perhaps also this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transici&#243;n de Obama: pol&#237;tica econ&#243;mica (IV). M&#225;s sobre los impuestos. &#171; Sarah Palin en Español</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/01/27/the-new-laffer-curve-logic/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Transici&#243;n de Obama: pol&#237;tica econ&#243;mica (IV). M&#225;s sobre los impuestos. &#171; Sarah Palin en Español]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.wordpress.com/?p=117#comment-1128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] críticos de Laffer dicen que no hay evidencias ni pruebas de que esto sea así. Por ejemplo, esto sostiene Lane Kenworthy en su blog, quien además critica a Laffer porque recientemente dice que además de evitar la actividad [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] críticos de Laffer dicen que no hay evidencias ni pruebas de que esto sea así. Por ejemplo, esto sostiene Lane Kenworthy en su blog, quien además critica a Laffer porque recientemente dice que además de evitar la actividad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned Baker</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/01/27/the-new-laffer-curve-logic/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ned Baker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.wordpress.com/?p=117#comment-83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice analysis of Laffer&#039;s article.  I read it myself and had to write up a critique on my blog also.  This guy is a quack.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analysis of Laffer&#8217;s article.  I read it myself and had to write up a critique on my blog also.  This guy is a quack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crooked Timber &#187; &#187; Other places</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/01/27/the-new-laffer-curve-logic/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crooked Timber &#187; &#187; Other places]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.wordpress.com/?p=117#comment-81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Lane Kenworthy on &#8220;the (il)logic of the new Laffer Curve&#8220;. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lane Kenworthy on &#8220;the (il)logic of the new Laffer Curve&#8220;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

