<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Era of Democratic Dominance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/11/16/a-new-era-of-democratic-dominance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/11/16/a-new-era-of-democratic-dominance/</link>
	<description>Lane Kenworthy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:50:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven Brendel</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/11/16/a-new-era-of-democratic-dominance/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sven Brendel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for posting this - its good to have actual statistics rather than just theory on this topic. I have long beleived that this might well a liberal&#039;s 1980 - now I have some figures to back it up.

PS. I&#039;m glad to have found your blog - I&#039;m a poli sci student and have cited quite a few of your papers - my favorite one is your study of the relationship between the welfare state and aboslute poverty in developed countries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this &#8211; its good to have actual statistics rather than just theory on this topic. I have long beleived that this might well a liberal&#8217;s 1980 &#8211; now I have some figures to back it up.</p>
<p>PS. I&#8217;m glad to have found your blog &#8211; I&#8217;m a poli sci student and have cited quite a few of your papers &#8211; my favorite one is your study of the relationship between the welfare state and aboslute poverty in developed countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom the Redhunter</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/11/16/a-new-era-of-democratic-dominance/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom the Redhunter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Enduring shift&quot;  ... didn&#039;t we hear something similar to this not too many years ago from Carl Rove?  

This isn&#039;t the 1930s, whereby FDR could create a movement that dominated politics for a few generations.  Things move too fast nowadays.  

As a proud member of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy, I am plotting our comeback right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Enduring shift&#8221;  &#8230; didn&#8217;t we hear something similar to this not too many years ago from Carl Rove?  </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the 1930s, whereby FDR could create a movement that dominated politics for a few generations.  Things move too fast nowadays.  </p>
<p>As a proud member of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy, I am plotting our comeback right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard H. Serlin</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2008/11/16/a-new-era-of-democratic-dominance/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard H. Serlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How lasting and influential a party&#039;s dominance is depends on the longer term success and value of what it actually does. FDR passed the New Deal, which was enormously beneficial. Once it was passed, and people saw how false the Republican claims against it were, and how much better it made people&#039;s lives, and the country, the Republicans could never get rid of it. Their whole party was forced to move far to the left and accept it, or be voted out almost completely and become a minor party. 

The enormous good from the New Deal allowed for 45 years of very strong Democratic dominance. By contrast, most of the policies of the conservative Republicans, by and large, did great harm over the medium and long run to the vast majority; they were discredited, and as a result, the Republicans&#039; dominance was only about 25 years and much less strong. And staying in power even that long was due largely to deception, distraction, appeals to racism, and big money from the rich and special interests.

The most important thing for Obama will be to pass Universal Healthcare. This would be like the New Deal and Medicare; once it was passed, and people saw how false the Republican claims against it were, and how much better it made people&#039;s lives, and the country, the Republicans could never get rid of it. The whole party would be forced to move far to the left and accept it, or be heavily voted out and become a minor party. 

Passing Universal Healthcare is crucial to lasting Democratic dominance and doing lasting good. I have a post on this at: http://richardhserlin.blogspot.com/2008/11/theres-nothing-more-important-for-obama.html.

With regard to people tending to stick with their first party, this is also true in marketing. I remember in my MBA days learning how hard companies try to get college students first out on their own to use their toothpaste and beer, knowing the likelihood that it would create loyalty that would last a lifetime. 

One of the unfortunate weaknesses of academia is the reluctance of fields to learn from and work with each other; unfortunately the reward/penalty system fosters this, but it would be valuable for political science and sociology professors researching this to look at the marketing literature.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How lasting and influential a party&#8217;s dominance is depends on the longer term success and value of what it actually does. FDR passed the New Deal, which was enormously beneficial. Once it was passed, and people saw how false the Republican claims against it were, and how much better it made people&#8217;s lives, and the country, the Republicans could never get rid of it. Their whole party was forced to move far to the left and accept it, or be voted out almost completely and become a minor party. </p>
<p>The enormous good from the New Deal allowed for 45 years of very strong Democratic dominance. By contrast, most of the policies of the conservative Republicans, by and large, did great harm over the medium and long run to the vast majority; they were discredited, and as a result, the Republicans&#8217; dominance was only about 25 years and much less strong. And staying in power even that long was due largely to deception, distraction, appeals to racism, and big money from the rich and special interests.</p>
<p>The most important thing for Obama will be to pass Universal Healthcare. This would be like the New Deal and Medicare; once it was passed, and people saw how false the Republican claims against it were, and how much better it made people&#8217;s lives, and the country, the Republicans could never get rid of it. The whole party would be forced to move far to the left and accept it, or be heavily voted out and become a minor party. </p>
<p>Passing Universal Healthcare is crucial to lasting Democratic dominance and doing lasting good. I have a post on this at: <a href="http://richardhserlin.blogspot.com/2008/11/theres-nothing-more-important-for-obama.html" rel="nofollow">http://richardhserlin.blogspot.com/2008/11/theres-nothing-more-important-for-obama.html</a>.</p>
<p>With regard to people tending to stick with their first party, this is also true in marketing. I remember in my MBA days learning how hard companies try to get college students first out on their own to use their toothpaste and beer, knowing the likelihood that it would create loyalty that would last a lifetime. </p>
<p>One of the unfortunate weaknesses of academia is the reluctance of fields to learn from and work with each other; unfortunately the reward/penalty system fosters this, but it would be valuable for political science and sociology professors researching this to look at the marketing literature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

