<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reducing inequality: education to the rescue?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lanekenworthy.net/2009/04/14/reducing-inequality-education-to-the-rescue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2009/04/14/reducing-inequality-education-to-the-rescue/</link>
	<description>Lane Kenworthy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:50:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2009/04/14/reducing-inequality-education-to-the-rescue/#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.net/?p=2271#comment-1060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems those with competitive skills have had their incomes continue to rise in recent decades as though they were in a boat with a rising tide, while those without had concrete boots and could only let the water rise around them. The &quot;rise of the rest&quot; affects low-skilled workers far more than skilled workers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems those with competitive skills have had their incomes continue to rise in recent decades as though they were in a boat with a rising tide, while those without had concrete boots and could only let the water rise around them. The &#8220;rise of the rest&#8221; affects low-skilled workers far more than skilled workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2009/04/14/reducing-inequality-education-to-the-rescue/#comment-1059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.net/?p=2271#comment-1059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To add complication to the university degree statistic/data, it would be interesting to see the contribution of graduates of sciences, maths and professional programs (law, medical, business, engineering) versus the arts and social sciences.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add complication to the university degree statistic/data, it would be interesting to see the contribution of graduates of sciences, maths and professional programs (law, medical, business, engineering) versus the arts and social sciences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Ryan</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2009/04/14/reducing-inequality-education-to-the-rescue/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.net/?p=2271#comment-1057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great series of posts and comments - thanks to everyone, and particularly our host, Prof. Kenworthy.

I&#039;m curious - has anyone ever published an introductory-level explanation of human capital (including the decision to acquire it, i.e., education) in a manner analogous to the decision of firms to acquire physical (or intangible) capital goods?  Please let me know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great series of posts and comments &#8211; thanks to everyone, and particularly our host, Prof. Kenworthy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious &#8211; has anyone ever published an introductory-level explanation of human capital (including the decision to acquire it, i.e., education) in a manner analogous to the decision of firms to acquire physical (or intangible) capital goods?  Please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard H. Serlin</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2009/04/14/reducing-inequality-education-to-the-rescue/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard H. Serlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.net/?p=2271#comment-1052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;Education is important for individuals and for society, and I certainly favor efforts to improve both its quality and its quantity. But it doesn’t seem to me likely to get us very far in reversing the rise in American income inequality.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

It depends how much education. Certainly if 100% of children of parents in poverty or in low income families earned college degrees, then poverty in the next generation would absolutely plummet (and the country would be vastly wealthier and safer, and science, technology, and medicine would advance far faster.)

&lt;i&gt;&quot;But among those born between 1950 and 1965, who became an important part of the labor force beginning around 1980, college completion was pretty much flat, falling for males and increasing just slightly for females. This, say Goldin and Katz, is the key to the rise in earnings inequality that began at that time.

I think there’s something to this story, but I’m not sure it takes us very far in understanding the rise in U.S. earnings inequality or that it points us toward a solution.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m very sure it points to a solution to a very large extent. How about this for starters -- raising taxes on the wealthy enough to pay for universal preschool starting at age 3, and 100% government  paid for bachelors degree tuition and reasonable room and board for a typical 4-year state university for everyone. This is NOT a cost. It&#039;s a high return investment of the kind the pure free market will grossly underprovide due to well established in economics free market problems like externalities, asymmetric information, etc., etc.

A great thing about this solution is that when someone gets a college degree they increase their earnings by increasing the wealth they create -- usually by substantially more than their increase in earnings -- rather than by redistributing wealth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Education is important for individuals and for society, and I certainly favor efforts to improve both its quality and its quantity. But it doesn’t seem to me likely to get us very far in reversing the rise in American income inequality.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>It depends how much education. Certainly if 100% of children of parents in poverty or in low income families earned college degrees, then poverty in the next generation would absolutely plummet (and the country would be vastly wealthier and safer, and science, technology, and medicine would advance far faster.)</p>
<p><i>&#8220;But among those born between 1950 and 1965, who became an important part of the labor force beginning around 1980, college completion was pretty much flat, falling for males and increasing just slightly for females. This, say Goldin and Katz, is the key to the rise in earnings inequality that began at that time.</p>
<p>I think there’s something to this story, but I’m not sure it takes us very far in understanding the rise in U.S. earnings inequality or that it points us toward a solution.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m very sure it points to a solution to a very large extent. How about this for starters &#8212; raising taxes on the wealthy enough to pay for universal preschool starting at age 3, and 100% government  paid for bachelors degree tuition and reasonable room and board for a typical 4-year state university for everyone. This is NOT a cost. It&#8217;s a high return investment of the kind the pure free market will grossly underprovide due to well established in economics free market problems like externalities, asymmetric information, etc., etc.</p>
<p>A great thing about this solution is that when someone gets a college degree they increase their earnings by increasing the wealth they create &#8212; usually by substantially more than their increase in earnings &#8212; rather than by redistributing wealth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Johnsson</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2009/04/14/reducing-inequality-education-to-the-rescue/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefan Johnsson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.net/?p=2271#comment-1051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that education is very important and the way these graphs depict education is downplaying its role.  Education plays a very significant role in creating a better high-skilled labor force that can compete with immigrants that fill this demand, i.e. doctors.  

I would also like to see a graph of entrepreneurship and education.

Now, i do agree that it does not play such a significant factor in income inequality in a direct way...but it is indirectly important to create a healthier, growing middle class.  Better education provides people with the ability to think more for themselves and to have a better aim to better their lives and that of their family.

Side note:  I think that part of the income inequality is due to NAFTA, the outsourcing of jobs and the influx of low skill labor into the US.  The supply of workers is easily meeting the demand and there is no need for companies to raise wages.  Part of the reason that jobs paid will during WW II was that there was a significant demand for wage workers and this, in turn, raised wages.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that education is very important and the way these graphs depict education is downplaying its role.  Education plays a very significant role in creating a better high-skilled labor force that can compete with immigrants that fill this demand, i.e. doctors.  </p>
<p>I would also like to see a graph of entrepreneurship and education.</p>
<p>Now, i do agree that it does not play such a significant factor in income inequality in a direct way&#8230;but it is indirectly important to create a healthier, growing middle class.  Better education provides people with the ability to think more for themselves and to have a better aim to better their lives and that of their family.</p>
<p>Side note:  I think that part of the income inequality is due to NAFTA, the outsourcing of jobs and the influx of low skill labor into the US.  The supply of workers is easily meeting the demand and there is no need for companies to raise wages.  Part of the reason that jobs paid will during WW II was that there was a significant demand for wage workers and this, in turn, raised wages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

