<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Blair and Brown fail on inequality?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lanekenworthy.net/2009/06/01/did-blair-and-brown-fail-on-inequality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2009/06/01/did-blair-and-brown-fail-on-inequality/</link>
	<description>Lane Kenworthy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:54:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caernunos</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2009/06/01/did-blair-and-brown-fail-on-inequality/#comment-2652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caernunos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.net/?p=2905#comment-2652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A graph entirely consistent with the rich getting richer and the poor remaing, well, poor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A graph entirely consistent with the rich getting richer and the poor remaing, well, poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan hopkin</title>
		<link>http://lanekenworthy.net/2009/06/01/did-blair-and-brown-fail-on-inequality/#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonathan hopkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lanekenworthy.net/?p=2905#comment-1322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Lane
You&#039;re dead right that the distribution of income gains was far better under Labour than the Conservatives, but in the end there was so much to do that this didn&#039;t prove enough. Labour had a decade of untrammeled power under the Westminster model and rather &#039;bottled out&#039; in the end.
The chart from Brewer et al also gives us a nice clue as to why Labour&#039;s support is collapsing. There was a redistribution from the median voter - or something just to the right of him/her - to the poorer and richer parts of society. The 4th-8th deciles are too big a bunch of voters to mess with, and they would have done better under a less redistributive regime.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lane<br />
You&#8217;re dead right that the distribution of income gains was far better under Labour than the Conservatives, but in the end there was so much to do that this didn&#8217;t prove enough. Labour had a decade of untrammeled power under the Westminster model and rather &#8216;bottled out&#8217; in the end.<br />
The chart from Brewer et al also gives us a nice clue as to why Labour&#8217;s support is collapsing. There was a redistribution from the median voter &#8211; or something just to the right of him/her &#8211; to the poorer and richer parts of society. The 4th-8th deciles are too big a bunch of voters to mess with, and they would have done better under a less redistributive regime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

