Inclusion: African Americans

Lane Kenworthy, The Good Society
January 2017

Martin Luther King’s 1963 “I Have a Dream” speech offered a vision of an inclusive America.

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character….

“I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal’….

“I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood…. I have a dream that one day down in Alabama … little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers….

“If America is to be a great nation, this must be true.”

How far have we progressed toward the great nation of King’s vision, toward genuine inclusion of African Americans?

Inclusion has three components: (1) Similar treatment by key institutions (schools, the legal system, etc.) and by other groups. (2) Opportunity to participate fully in society. This entails not just the absence of barriers, but also, where necessary, ample supports. (3) Embrace as part of the community.

The enslavement of blacks in the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries is one of the worst things the United States has done, and progress in rectifying our policies and institutions came slowly. Slavery was outlawed in 1865, following the union victory in the Civil War. Yet physical violence, sharecropping arrangements, segregation laws, and poll taxes and literacy tests were used to subjugate blacks for another century in much of the south, and residential segregation and employer discrimination hindered opportunity in the rest of the country. In 1954, segregation in public schools was ruled unconstitutional. Then, following a decade of activism and protest by the civil rights movement, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed racial discrimination in school admissions, housing, hiring, and pay. In the late 1960s state laws forbidding interracial marriage were banned and affirmative action policies began.

A generation later, in 1997, Stephen and Abigail Thernstrom published a major assessment of racial progress titled America in Black and White: One Nation, Indivisible. Their conclusion was positive and optimistic. “Today,” they wrote, “almost three-quarters of black families are above the poverty line. In 1940, 87 percent of black families were in poverty; the figure was down to 47 percent in 1960 and 26 percent in 1995. The black college population has grown from 45,000 in 1940 to over 1.4 million today, a thirtyfold increase. Sixty percent of employed black women were domestic servants in 1940; today very few are. A majority, in fact, hold white-collar jobs. The number of black men in professional occupations has also risen impressively. Power and influence were exclusively white prerogatives in 1940; there was no Vernon Jordan and no Michael Jordan.”1 Nor, we can now add, was there a Barack Obama — America’s first black president, elected in 2008 and again in 2012.

What does an updated look at our progress toward inclusion of African Americans tell us? To what extent has progress continued?


Measuring inclusion isn’t straightforward. Many of the available indicators are of disparities in outcomes. This is partly because we often lack direct measures of treatment or opportunity and partly because sharply and persistently unequal outcomes foster a feeling of exclusion.

Let’s begin with education. Figure 1 shows the gap in test scores between African Americans and whites at kindergarten and at age 9. The gaps are sizable, but they’ve been decreasing steadily over the past two decades.

Figure 1. Education: black-white test score gap
Gap between average white score and average black score, in standard deviations. Data source: Sean F. Reardon and Ximena A. Portilla, “Recent Trends in Income, Income, Racial, and Ethnic School Readiness Gaps at Kindergarten Entry,” AERA Open, 2016, figure 1 and table 2, using data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Studies (ECLS) and the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).

Figure 2 shows that the share of African Americans completing high school increased dramatically in the 1960s and 1970s, and by the mid-1990s it had caught up with the white share. It has stayed level since then. Here progress toward inclusion has been substantial and sustained.

Figure 2. Education: high school degree
Share of persons age 25-29. Data source: Census Bureau, “Educational Attainment: CPS Historical Time Series Tables,” table 2.

African Americans have achieved similar, if not quite as rapid, gains in college completion, as figure 3 shows. Whites have experienced a similar rise, so the size of the gap has remained fairly constant. But we shouldn’t conclude that the continued gap indicates a lack of progress.

Figure 3. Education: four-year college degree
Share of persons age 25-29. Data source: Census Bureau, “Educational Attainment: CPS Historical Time Series Tables,” table 2.

As figure 4 shows, African Americans are more likely to be employed today than a generation ago, despite the damaged wreaked by the 2008-09 economic crisis. At the same time, they haven’t moved closer to whites in a relative sense; in fact, the racial gap in employment rates has increased a little.

Figure 4. Employment rate
Share of the population age 25-64. The lines are loess curves. The vertical axis doesn’t begin at zero. Data source: General Social Survey,, series wrkstat.

A useful if imperfect indicator of the well-being of those at the bottom of the economic ladder is the poverty rate — the share of people living in a household with an income below the poverty line (about $12,000 for a single individual and $24,000 for a family of four). As figure 5 indicates, according to the official measure, the poverty rate for all groups dropped sharply in the 1960s. That was especially true for African Americans. Since the mid-1970s there’s been no further progress for whites. For African Americans, the second half of the 1990s saw a further drop. While a sizable gap remains, it is much smaller than in 1960 or even in 1990.

Figure 5. Poverty rate
Share of persons in households with income below the official poverty line. Data source: Census Bureau, “Historical Poverty Tables,” table 2.

Have African Americans made similar progress in the middle? One indicator is median earnings. As figure 6 shows, reliable data are available beginning in the late 1960s. For white Americans, median earnings have been stagnant since the early 1970s. For African Americans, median earnings rose until the late 1970s, then were stagnant in the 1980s and early 1990s before rising again in the late 1990s. Since 2000 they have, like for whites, been flat. So there has been some relative progress for blacks, but it’s been muted, and the big picture here is that earnings have barely budged for middle-class Americans since the 1970s.2

Figure 6. Median earnings
Median annual earnings for persons employed full-time year-round. “k” = thousand. Data source: Census Bureau, “Historical Income Tables,” table P-38, using Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

When we turn to household income, the picture is similarly unimpressive. Indeed, as figure 7 shows, median household income for African Americans is only a little higher today than it was half a century ago, and there has been no progress in closing the gap with whites.

Figure 7. Median household income
Posttransfer-pretax income. “k” = thousand. Data source: Census Bureau, “Historical Income Tables,” table H-5.

Nor has there been any closing of the gap in median household wealth, as figure 8 indicates. Median wealth is shockingly low for African American households, at less than $10,000.3

Figure 8. Median household wealth
“k” = thousand. Data source: Pew Research Center, “King’s Dream Remains an Elusive Goal,” 2013, using Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) data.

So too with homeownership, which is the principal source of wealth for most middle-class households. As figure 9 shows, we’ve seen no progress for African Americans in absolute or relative terms since the mid-1970s.

Figure 9. Homeownership
Data source: Joint Center on Housing Studies, Harvard University, The State of the Nation’s Housing.

Figure 10 shows that fewer African Americans than whites say they are satisfied with their community as a place to live. These data don’t go back very far in time, so it’s impossible to tell whether or not there has been progress.

Figure 10. Satisfied with community as a place to live
The vertical axis doesn’t begin at zero. Data source: Pew Research Center.

Since the early 1970s, the General Social Survey has regularly asked Americans whether they think they are lower class, working class, middle class, or upper class. Figure 11 shows that there is a sizable gap between African Americans and whites in the share saying they are middle or upper class, with little change over time among either group.

Figure 11. Perceived middle class or higher
Share of US adults saying they are middle or upper class. Response options: lower, working, middle, upper. Data source: General Social Survey,, series class.


Next, let’s look at some “social” indicators of well-being. Figure 12 shows the share of 25-to-64-year-olds who are married. The share is lower among African Americans than among whites. It has been falling among both groups, but more rapidly among blacks, so the gap has widened.

Figure 12. Marriage
Share of persons age 25-64 who are married. The lines are loess curves. Data source: General Social Survey,, series marital.

Figure 13 shows the share of families with children that are headed by a single parent. Here too the gap is large and has widened a little over time.4

Figure 13. Single-parent families
Nonmarried, noncohabitating families with children as a share of all families with children. The lines are loess curves. Data source: General Social Survey,, series hhtype1.

Life expectancy, shown in figure 14, is an indicator on which African Americans have made both absolute and relative progress. The average black American lived 63.5 years in 1960. By 2014 that had increased to 75.5 years, just 3.5 years shy of the average among whites.

Figure 14. Life expectancy
Years at birth. The vertical axis doesn’t begin at zero. Data source: NCHS, National Vital Statistics Reports.

African Americans are much more likely to be murdered than whites, as figure 15 shows. Yet after widening from the mid-1960s through the early 1990s, the racial gap in homicide victimization has closed considerably, and it’s now smaller than half a century ago.

Figure 15. Homicide victims
Per 100,000 persons. Data source: NCHS, Health, United States, 2015, table 17.

Suicide is less common among black Americans than among whites, as figure 16 shows, making it one of the rare well-being indicators on which African Americans enjoy an advantage. And that advantage has increased over the past half century, particularly since 2000.

Figure 16. Suicides
Per 100,000 persons. Data source: NCHS, Health, United States, 2015, table 17.

The General Social Survey regularly asks Americans whether they are very happy, pretty happy, or not too happy. As figure 17 indicates, African Americans are less likely than whites to say they are very or pretty happy. The gap has closed somewhat, though much of the progress came in the 1970s and 1980s.5

Figure 17. Very happy or pretty happy
Share of US adults. Question: “Taken all together, how would you say things are these days — would you say that you are very happy, pretty happy, or not too happy?” The lines are loess curves. The vertical axis doesn’t begin at zero. Data source: General Social Survey,, series happy.


Inclusion doesn’t require full mixing. Not every neighborhood or school has to perfectly match the racial mix in the population. Yet we can’t have genuine inclusion if a group is heavily separated from others.

Residential segregation has been a core feature of the exclusion of blacks from the American community, particularly in northern cities.6 Figure 18 shows that segregation in housing between blacks and whites has declined significantly since 1970.7 Both of the standard measures, the dissimilarity index and the isolation index, suggest this. The level of segregation remains quite high; more than half of blacks and whites would have to move to a different neighborhood to get to full integration. Still, we do see progress.

Figure 18. Residential segregation
The dissimilarity index is the proportion of people that would have to move to a different neighborhood in order to achieve perfect integration. The isolation index measures the tendency of one group to live in neighborhoods where their share of the population is above the citywide average. Excludes small rural areas. Data source: Edward L. Glaeser and Jacob L. Vigdor, “The End of the Segregated Century: Racial Separation in America’s Neighborhoods,” Manhattan Institute, 2012, figure 1.

In K-12 schools the pattern has been very different. Here a useful measure is the share of black children who attend a majority nonwhite school. Prior to the mid-1950s Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court ruling, school segregation was the law in 17 southern states. As figure 19 shows, there was enormous progress in reducing school segregation in the south in the 1960s. But since 1970 there’s been no further advance, and even a little backsliding.8

Figure 19. School segregation in 17 southern states
Share of black children who attend a majority nonwhite school. Data source: Gary Orfield and Erica Frankenberg, “Brown at 60,” The Civil Rights Project, 2014, table 3.


As figure 20 shows, in 1960 young black men were more than twice as likely as their white counterparts to serve time in jail or prison. As the country adopted a “lock ’em up” approach to crime control beginning in the 1970s, this racial gap exploded.9 In 2000, 12% of African American males aged 20-24 were incarcerated, versus 2% of whites. The disparity has lessened a bit since then, but it remains huge.

Figure 20. Incarceration
Share in federal, state, and local jails. Data source: Derek Neal and Armin Rick, “The Prison Boom and the Lack of Black Progress after Smith and Welch,” 2014.

Unequal and sometimes hostile treatment by police, judges, and other elements of the criminal justice system is a long-running source of African Americans’ perception of exclusion. “The police departments of your country,” writes Ta-Nehisi Coates, “have been endowed with the authority to destroy your body. It does not matter if the destruction is the result of an unfortunate overreaction. It does not matter if it originates in a misunderstanding. It does not matter if the destruction springs from a foolish policy. Sell cigarettes without the proper authority and your body can be destroyed. Resent the people trying to entrap your body and it can be destroyed. Turn into a dark stairwell and your body can be destroyed. The destroyers will rarely be held accountable. Mostly they will receive pensions. And destruction is merely the superlative form of a dominion whose prerogatives include friskings, detainings, beatings, and humiliations. All of this is common to black people. And all of this is old for black people.”10

In 2015, police killed approximately 1,000 people across the United States, about 40 of which were unarmed African Americans.11 Are police systematically more likely to shoot and kill unarmed blacks than whites?

We have two in-depth studies. Roland Fryer examined 1,332 police shootings that occurred between 2000 and 2015. Fryer and his research team found that in cases where the suspect didn’t have a weapon and didn’t attack the police officers, the officers were more likely to fire their weapon when the suspect was black. But in a more detailed look at cases in the city of Houston, including not only instances in which a police shooting occurred but also those in which it could have occurred but didn’t, Fryer and his team found that police weren’t more likely to shoot blacks. They also found that, across the nation, black suspects stopped by police were more likely than white suspects to experience nonlethal use of force — to be handcuffed, to be pushed to the ground, to have a gun pointed at them.12

Sendhil Mullainathan found that 32% of those shot by police are black and 29% of arrestees are black. So given an arrest, a black person is no more likely to be killed by police than a white person. If there is unfair or unequal treatment, it is in the rate of arrest, rather than in the likelihood of police shooting.13

So the data seem to suggest that blacks are more likely than whites to be stopped by police and to experience use of force if stopped. Among those stopped or arrested, blacks aren’t, it appears, more likely than whites to be shot at or killed by police. It’s the fact that they are stopped and arrested more frequently than whites that makes African Americans more likely to end up shot at or killed.

Why are blacks more likely than whites to have encounters — stoppings, arrests — with the police? In a 2016 Pew poll, 18% of blacks said they have been stopped by police unfairly in the past 12 months, versus only 3% of whites. A 2016 Justice Department investigation found that for years the Baltimore Police Department has systematically stopped, searched, and arrested black residents without sufficient rationale.14


What does public opinion data tell us about the degree to which white Americans embrace their black compatriots?

The American National Election Study routinely asks people to rate how they feel about various groups and institutions on a “feeling thermometer,” ranging from not favorable (0) to favorable (100). Figure 21 shows how Americans, on average, feel about blacks and about whites. In 1964 there was a sizable gap, with the average feeling toward blacks at 63 and the average toward whites at 83. The gap closed steadily during the ensuing decades, and in 2004 it reached parity. There was again a bit of separation in 2008 and 2012, but the gap remained good bit smaller than it had been half a century earlier.

Figure 21. Feeling thermometer
Question: “When I read the name of a group, we’d like you to rate it with what we call a feeling thermometer. Ratings between 50 degrees and 100 degrees mean that you feel favorably and warm toward the group; ratings between 0 and 50 degrees mean that you don’t feel favorably towards the group and that you don’t care too much for that group. If you don’t feel particularly warm or cold toward a group you would rate them at 50 degrees. If we come to a group you don’t know much about, just tell me and we’ll move on to the next one.” Data source: American National Election Studies,, series vcf0206 (1964-2004), v085064y (2008), ftcasi_black (2012) and vdf0207 (1964-2004), v085065c (2008), ftcasi_white (2012).

Figure 22 shows direct indicators of whites’ attitudes toward African Americans and toward their inclusion. Each suggests progress. Nearly all whites now say they would vote for a qualified African American for president, and indeed many did in 2008 and 2012. About three-quarters say they’d be willing to live in a half-black neighborhood. A sizable majority say they oppose housing discrimination and that blacks aren’t lazy. Smaller but increased shares say it’s okay for blacks “to push where not wanted” and okay for a close relative to marry a black person.

Figure 22. Whites’ embrace of African Americans
Share of white adults. The lines are loess curves. Vote for black president. Question: “If your party nominated an African-American for President, would you vote for him if he were qualified for the job?” Response options: yes, no. The line shows the share responding yes. Data source: General Social Survey (GSS),, series racpres. Willing to live in half black neighborhood. Question: “Would you be favorable or opposed to … living in a neighborhood where half of your neighbors were black?” Data source: GSS, series liveblks. Oppose housing discrimination. Question: “Do you agree or disagree: White people have a right to keep African-Americans out of their neighborhoods if they want to, and African-Americans should respect that right.” Response options: agree strongly, agree slightly, disagree slightly, disagree strongly. The line shows the share responding disagree strongly. Data source: GSS, series racseg. Blacks not lazy. Question: “Do people in the group tend to be hard-working or if they tend to be lazy. Blacks.” The line shows the share choosing 1-4 on a scale of 1 (hardworking) to 7 (lazy). Data source: GSS, series workblks. Okay for blacks to push where not wanted. Question: “Do you agree or disagree: African-Americans shouldn’t push themselves where they’re not wanted.” Response options: agree strongly, agree slightly, disagree slightly, disagree strongly. The line shows the share responding disagree strongly. Data source: GSS, series racpush. Okay close relative marry black person. Question: “What about having a close relative marry a black person? Would you be very in favor of it happening, somewhat in favor, neither in favor nor opposed to it happening, somewhat opposed, or very opposed to it happening?” The line shows the share responding very in favor. Data source: GSS, series marblk.

In the most thorough study to date of data on whites’ attitudes toward African Americans, published in 2012, Lawrence Bobo and colleagues conclude that “A Jim Crow-era commitment to segregation, explicit white privilege, revulsion against mixed marriages, and the categorical belief that blacks were inherently and biologically inferior to whites collapsed. Broad support for equal treatment, integration, and a large measure of tolerance supplanted these views.”

But the news isn’t entirely good. They also find that “despite accepting integration as a general principle and a small minority presence in schools, neighborhoods, or other public social spaces, whites express strong social distance preferences.” And “negative racial stereotypes remain widespread, but they differ from past stereotyping in two important ways. Contemporary negative views of blacks have a gradational or qualified, rather than categorical, character. The basis for such perceptions also appears to have shifted away from presumed biological or natural differences toward presumptions rooted in group culture.”15


According to available public opinion survey data, African Americans are fairly pessimistic about how far the United States has moved toward racial equality, about whether the country has taken the steps needed to create equal opportunity, about the prevalence and importance of discrimination, and about race relations overall.

In 2013, the Pew Research Center asked a sample of Americans whether they thought the country “has made a lot of progress toward Martin Luther King’s dream of racial equality over the last 50 years.” As figure 23 indicates, only a third of blacks said yes.

Figure 23. The US has made a lot of progress toward Martin Luther King’s dream of racial equality over the last 50 years
Share of African American adults. Data source: Pew Research Center, “King’s Dream Remains an Elusive Goal; Many Americans See Racial Disparities,” 2013.

Figure 24 shows that even fewer African Americans — less than 10% in 2015 and 2016 — agree that “Our country has made the changes needed to give blacks equal rights with whites.”

Figure 24. Our country has made the changes needed to give blacks equal rights with whites
Share of African American adults. Data source: Pew Research Center, “On Views of Race and Inequality, Blacks and Whites Are Worlds Apart,” 2016.

Figure 25 shows African Americans’ responses to a variety of questions about discrimination and its impact. A third of blacks say they’ve experienced discrimination in the past year. Half to three-quarters say discrimination exists and is important in employment, living standards, and treatment by police.

Figure 25. Discrimination’s prevalence and importance
Share of African American adults. The lines are loess curves. Blacks treated less fairly than whites at work: “Are blacks in your community treated less fairly than whites … on the job or at work?” Data source: Pew Research Center, “On Views of Race and Inequality, Blacks and Whites Are Worlds Apart,” 2016. Blacks don’t have as good a chance as whites to get job: “Blacks have as good a chance as whites in my community to get any kind of job for which they are qualified.” Data source: Gallup, “Americans’ Optimism About Blacks’ Opportunities Wanes,” 2016. Discrimination is key reason blacks have harder time: “On the average, African-Americans have worse jobs, income, and housing than white people. Do you think these differences are mainly due to discrimination?” Data source: General Social Survey,, series racdif1. Blacks treated less fairly than whites by police: “Are blacks in your community treated less fairly than whites … in dealing with police?” Data source: Pew Research Center, “On Views of Race and Inequality, Blacks and Whites Are Worlds Apart,” 2016. Experienced discrimination in past 12 months: “During the past 12 months, have you personally experienced discrimination or been treated unfairly because of your race or ethnic background, or not?” Data source: Pew Research Center, “On Views of Race and Inequality, Blacks and Whites Are Worlds Apart,” 2016.

Finally, figure 26 shows that about two-thirds of African Americans think race relations in the US are bad.

Figure 26. Race relations are bad
Share of African American adults. Question: “Do you think race relations in the United States are generally good or generally bad?” Data source: Pew Research Center, “On Views of Race and Inequality, Blacks and Whites Are Worlds Apart,” 2016.


America has progressed toward greater inclusion of African Americans. We see this in the absolute improvement on a number of indicators and the relative improvement on some. At the same time, the amount of progress since the 1970s has been disappointingly limited. Why is that? There are three main explanatory candidates.

One stresses continued discrimination. Research consistently finds that discrimination still exists and that it matters. The clearest signal comes from “audit” studies, in which are large number of (fake) job applicants are matched along a host of relevant criteria, with the only noteworthy difference being their race.16 What’s less clear is the degree to which discrimination accounts for our limited progress toward racial inclusion in the past generation, particularly given that, although we have little hard data, discrimination almost certainly has continued to decrease.

A second hypothesis suggests that cultural factors matter most — in particular, a culture among African Americans that attaches less value to family stability, education, and employment.17 Culture surely does affect people’s life chances to an appreciable degree, but this account falls short in the face of research that finds less-educated African American women are just as committed as middle-class white women (perhaps moreso) to marriage and that many black males from less-advantaged homes are no less dedicated to school and work than their white counterparts.18 The culture hypothesis also fails to account for limited progress by middle-class African Americans.

Probably the most important reason why America has stumbled in its movement toward greater racial inclusiveness was highlighted by William Julius Wilson in The Declining Significance of Race, The Truly Disadvantaged, and When Work Disappears: economic restructuring has made employment and wage increases less likely and more precarious for working-class and middle-class Americans, regardless of their race or ethnicity. Because of the prior effects of slavery, racism, and discrimination along with the contemporary impact of the criminal justice system, African Americans are overrepresented among this group. More of them have thereby suffered from this economic transformation.19

  1. Stephen Thernstrom and Abigail Thernstrom, America in Black and White: One Nation, Indivisible, Harvard University Press, 1997, pp. 18-19. 
  2. Valerie Wilson and William M. Rodgers III, “Black-White Wage Gaps Expand with Rising Wage Inequality,” Economic Policy Institute, 2016. 
  3. Thomas Shapiro, Tatjana Meschede, and Sam Osoro, “The Roots of the Widening Racial Wealth Gap: Explaining the Black-White Economic Divide,” Institute on Assets and Social Policy, 2013. 
  4. Sara McLanahan and Christopher Jencks, “Was Moynihan Right?,” Education Next, 2015. 
  5. See also Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers, “Subjective and Objective Indicators of Racial Progress,” Working Paper 18916, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2013. Stevenson and Wolfers note that an alternative data source, a DDB-Needham Life Style Study question on life satisfaction, tells a similar story. 
  6. Douglas S. Massey and Nancy A. Denton, American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass, Harvard University Press, 1993. 
  7. Douglas S. Massey, Jonathan Rothwell, and Thurston Domina, “The Changing Bases of Segregation in the United States,” Annals of the AAPSS, 2009; Edward L. Glaeser and Jacob L. Vigdor, “The End of the Segregated Century: Racial Separation in America’s Neighborhoods,” Manhattan Institute, 2012. 
  8. Nikole Hannah-Jones, “Choosing a School for My Daughter in a Segregated City,” New York Times, 2016. 
  9. Bruce Western, Punishment and Inequality in America, Russell Sage Foundation, 2006. 
  10. Ta-Nehisi Coates, Between the World and Me, Spiegel and Grau, 2015, p. 9. 
  11. “People Shot Dead by Police in 2015,” Washington Post. 
  12. Roland G. Fryer, Jr, “An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force,” Working Paper 22399, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2016. 
  13. Sendhil Mullainathan, “Police Killings of Blacks: What the Data Say,” New York Times, 2015. 
  14. US Department of Justice, “Investigation of the Baltimore City Police Department,” 2016. 
  15. Lawrence D. Bobo, Camille Z. Charles, Maria Krysan, and Alicia D. Simmons, “The Real Record on Racial Attitudes,” in Social Trends in American Life, edited by Peter V. Marsden, Princeton University Press, 2012, pp. 74-75. 
  16. Marianne Bertrand and Sendhil Mullainathan, “Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination,” American Economic Review, 2004; Roland G. Fryer, Jr, Devah Pager, and Jörg L. Spenkuch, “Racial Disparities in Job Finding and Offered Wages,” Working Paper 17462, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011; S. Michael Gaddis, “Discrimination in the Credential Society: An Audit Study of Race and College Selectivity in the Labor Market,” Social Forces, 2015. 
  17. Nicholas Lemann, “The Origins of the Underclass,” The Atlantic, 1986. 
  18. Kathryn Edin and Maria J. Kefalas, Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before Marriage, University of California Press, 2005; Jay MacLeod, Ain’t No Makin’ It: Aspirations and Attainment in a Low-Income Neighborhood, 3rd edition, Westview Press, 2009. 
  19. William Julius Wilson, The Declining Significance of Race, University of Chicago Press, 1978; Wilson, The Truly Disadvantaged, University of Chicago Press, 1987; Wilson, When Work Disappears, Vintage, 1996. See also Lane Kenworthy, “Shared Prosperity,” The Good Society.